Remarks
Annotations
-
I am working on a system I call living documents. There's a link to a screencast here: https://github.com/samsquire/ideas#4-living-documentsI like this idea. Every system needs to work with pen and paper at some point.I like this idea. Could be combined with business cloud. One of my ideas: https://github.com/samsquire/ideas2#98-business-cloudI like this idea. You could have arbitrary pairing of people trained in business administration, hospitality work together to be a coffee shop.I think we have to reliably encode our desires into the system. Everyone must feed in their desires for this superoptimizer to work. It could also try optimize everyone identically. I have an idea I call want marketplaces for the collection and aggregation of wants. There's a possibility of fusion there.Could use autosummarizers to decide what headlines to create in the generated video.I think encouraging people to run an Insurance app on their phones would be a good idea too. So people help insure against their contribution to climate change etc. Could foster an age where people use an app to self-insure, p2p insure or insure through companies.I've found that N3 tuples work for any problem too! You can use N3 tuples to describe many different facts ontologically and semantically. I'm even writing a GUI framework using them.There does need to be a way to re-invest in open source software. I thought of an open source subscription before. But getting people to pay for it when it seems free....This would reduce the barrier to entry too.I want a general purpose data editor.There's a huge difference between communism and communionism. I want communionism which has your definition.A company can have facets of other companies running through it.Do you mean deus ex machina rather than occam's razor? When I get around to it, I'll add up the number of supermarket workers, nurses, doctors and other vocations that I consider to be essential for society that are underpaid. And divide that billion by that number of people. And delivery drivers. It would be every year. It's a reward for being essential to society.This idea is more that your debit card decides how much you pay when you go to buy your coffee.You card is linked to your identity and your identity is linked to your tax account. Prices can be scaled to a maximum cost.This exists as scaling fees https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sliding_scale_feesI see every purchase of a product funds a set of activities or programmes, the money must physically go to those areas. That's what I mean by wrapped, you're buying more than just the thing on the shelf, but you're investing in lots of other things too. A map on the wrapper or a link to the product map is a great idea. I like that.There would have to be another protocol for the exchange of wants with gives files. The seller could contact the buyer and automatically arrange a price based on the minimum that the buyer is willing to buy. Or the buyer could spider the sellers and contract the seller that they choose. it should be all automatedI imagine one that would have merit on the internet: Here's an archive and its hash, i will pay people £X currency to host it for meCan computers do this? Symbolic reasoning?There's the humanist manifestos if you're not Christian.The goal is to find cross institution joins. Things that are difficult without having the data in one database.I suspect this idea can be implemented by nested exchanges. * Every aspect of getting a business off the ground relies on the exchange of money for some item off an exchange. so this idea relies on a platform that someone builds to exchange products and services. and having them integrated behind one business account. * A data format for an organisation, which includes the network of inputs and outputs which you've elucididated on before. I've proposed [MRSGREN](https://github.com/samsquire/ideas3#35-mrsgren) on my ideas document as an organisational strategy or verbs for operation. * Integrated payments and invoicing. * Integrated market research market for purchase. I've proposed how you would provision a cafe with the software. The integrations are numerous.I propose a Terraform-like tool for provisioning real life things, in the real world. We just need to decide what attributes a business has and what attributes all of these objects have. People can then integrate by writing provisioners for integrations with existing market places or new platform ones. 0oo could be the place where this happens ;-)I've looked at OpenERP. It could very well form a basis for wiring it up to be peer to peer and to be provisionable. It needs marketplace functionality.A community of people can decide how they want a business to look like and how they operate ethically etc. Business becomes sourcecode. <pre> resource "company" "sams-coffee-shop" { description = "Selling bespoke coffee" } resource "menu" "morning-menu" { product "mocha" { sell_price = £2.65 procurement "fair trade chocolate powder" { buy_price = "£1" } procurement "fair trade coffee" { buy_price = "£3" target_price = 0.85p } procurement "cups" { buy_price = £1 target_price = 0.85p } } } </pre>I'm familiar with expert systems such as Drools which uses the rete algorithm which is really clever. And I know about OpenAPI But they still have to be explicitly coded.In the UK the free market creates minimum wage jobs and barely any high paying jobs. Doctors deserve good salaries, footballers deserve less salaries.People do not understand the components of their operating system or the components of a car, or aeroplane, so we have to specialise as a society, as individuals. There's a cross fertilising of the idea of apocolypse technology -- there is also apocolypse jobs. All that's needed to have a well functional supply chain of goods from manufacture, to logistics requires a number of different specialisms. Shelf stackers deserve more pay from where I'm standing.If it wasn't clear, the whole bulleted pointed list in this ideas description would be the programme running automatically. Businesses would pop up due to programmatic rules.I like the formulation of "Autonomy", "Purpose", "Mastery" of personal happiness at work. I'm missing all three at the moment, as a result, I'm miserable at work.I was thinking of freight trains between towns. You have one town that specialises in making one kind of thing, or one element of the supply chain. Then you have the next town along manufacture the next part or assemble what the previous town created. Are there many manufacturing hubs not in China?I think education as a way of moderating population growth is sinister. People are holding back having families due to their careers which are all or nothing jobs. That's not a future I like.The study of human activities would be quite interesting I reckon. It's a mixture of antropology and psycology because you're studying a particular person's mindset.It was more for personal information used for business purposes such as buying some thing online, my title, full name, address and bank details.I'm thinking of some thing very simple. We register a data handler in browser/mobile phone for datahub:/ url links The URL must contain what's requested datahub:firstname,lastname,email,dob,http://returnaddress Then the return address gets pinged with the data from the datahub.If we want it to be part of backend processing, such as a corporations backend processing or whenever they happen to require the data, they will need to be a server side component. Or an intermediary. The intermediary would have a connection over VPN or zerotier, a link to the user's device where the data can be requested. The intermediary can be authenticated via OAuth.Taking a new person into the organisation is eating/nutrition. Disposing of waste is excretion. To make something is respiration.Growth is not redundant because you need to advertise or recruit.I feel there is synergy with the [Unity app](https://0oo.li/method/1016/unity-app#1607877179) with this idea. Call it a flash community feature.Could this be a sentence by sentence thing? Ideally something as simple as the bible's numbering system would work if people split up their articles whereby every one or two sentences is a verse that can be referenced.I want to be part of a group of people that are my age group, my gender, my hobbies. I want to be part of multiple groups simultaneously.I want the group's to be spelled out too. I want to have to explicitly join the group that is my age group. Find some unity with the members there with question and answersSo the service is not abused, I suspect there should be a limit on how many hours you can send your child to the government funded childcare. This is derived from the minimum number of hours for time with family that constitutes a happy family life. it could be something like happy families work best when the children spend at least 3 hours a day excluding sleep at home.I would like to see a "Person Count" on labels for products. That's how many people benefit by you buying that product, the number of people that were involved in producing the product. You could also track water usage, electricity usage and put that on the label.// So, "ad-idem" (or on ideas) would probably be the better approach. Again, it also heavily depends on how you formulate those questions. If you read the idea again you get presented with ideas and you vote for or against them. // People generally don't like to be judged I think people enjoy doing quizzes and answering questions.
Answers:
Include "> Qn" inside your messages to include them as responses here.